Technical committee
Members of the technical committee
-Deputy of
Quality Assessment of Iran National Standards Organization (Secretary of
the Policymaking Council and Head of the Technical Committee)
-General
Director of the Quality Assessment Office (Secretary of the Committee)
-Representatives
of the ministries/organizations that are members of the Supreme Standard
Council at the level of the General Director
-The
secretary of the steering committee of the administrative bodies or the
representative of the executive body
-Two faculty
members in the field of quality
-Two
assessors of the Iran National Quality Award
-Three
experts from scientific and professional associations and organizations in
the field of quality
-Three
managers or senior experts of the Iran National Standards Organization
-Secretary
of Iran National Quality Award Assessment Working Group Secretary of the Education Working Group
of Iran National Quality Award
Duties of the technical committee
-Revising the design of the award
model and its revisions and proposing to the Policymaking Council for final
approval
-Providing opinions of experts and
advisories regarding the implementation process of the award
-Provide a solution to solve possible
problems during the implementation process
-Reviewing the proposed amendment to
the regulations by the award secretariat and presenting technical and expert
opinions
-Reviewing modifications and
revisions, determining the primary evaluation criteria, sub-criteria, and their
scores in the award evaluation model
-Determining the maximum number of
points for each award level
-Determining the criteria and process
for qualifying and selecting the quality assessment executive manager of the
executive bodies and award executive management
-Determining the criteria and
procedure for confirming the qualification and selecting assessors, senior
assessors, and award trainers and approving, revising, and updating the
relevant guidelines
-Approving criteria and implementation
procedures for assessing applicants at different levels and reviewing policies
-Monitoring the transparency of the assessment process of the award applicants according to the criteria and
procedures approved by the committee
-Reviewing and validating the final report of
the assessment
-Reviewing and approving the performance report
of each award period to be submitted to the Policymaking Council
-Reviewing the performance of the past period
and the qualification of the award executive manager and quality assessment
executive manager of executives bodies and presenting improvement and promotion
proposals to the Policymaking Council for approval
-Handling complaints and making final decisions
regarding corruption by assessors, senior assessors, and trainers
-Reviewing the registration fee for different
levels of the award.